Or just very tactile? Somehow I think the "Please Do Not Touch" sign
at the exhibition would be ignored.

http://freshome.com/2011/03/27/fasci...dward-johnson/

R

"RicodJour" wrote in message
...
Or just very tactile? Somehow I think the "Please Do Not Touch" sign
at the exhibition would be ignored.

http://freshome.com/2011/03/27/fasci...dward-johnson/

R

Did you see all the lumps on that??

Time to fire up the belt sander and smooth it out!

I have no idea how he made that. He "hand made" it with the "latest
material technology". What does that mean?

I assume it meant he hand assembled it after running various panels through
a cnc router. I can't see doing al of that with a hammer and chisel.

On Apr 14, 4:30*pm, "Lee Michaels" leemichaels*nadaspam* at comcast
dot net wrote:
"RicodJour" wrote in message

...

Or just very tactile? Somehow I think the "Please Do Not Touch" sign
at the exhibition would be ignored.

http://freshome.com/2011/03/27/fasci...eboard-volumpt...

R

Did you see all the lumps on that??

Time to fire up the belt sander and smooth it out!

I have no idea how he made that. *He "hand made" it with the "latest
material technology". *What does that mean?

I assume it meant he hand assembled it after running various panels through
a cnc router. *I can't see doing al of that with *a hammer and chisel..

There was something, maybe not on that site, about the panels being
laminated, so I'm guessing he vacuum-formed them. I've never bent
wood, whether steamed or laminated, in more than one plane. I guess
there must have been a learning curve.

R

"RicodJour" wrote in message
...
On Apr 14, 4:30 pm, "Lee Michaels" leemichaels*nadaspam* at
comcast
dot net wrote:
"RicodJour" wrote in message

...

Or just very tactile? Somehow I think the "Please Do Not
Touch" sign
at the exhibition would be ignored.

http://freshome.com/2011/03/27/fasci...eboard-volumpt...

R

Did you see all the lumps on that??

Time to fire up the belt sander and smooth it out!

I have no idea how he made that. He "hand made" it with
the "latest
material technology". What does that mean?

I assume it meant he hand assembled it after running
various panels through
a cnc router. I can't see doing al of that with a hammer
and chisel.

There was something, maybe not on that site, about the
panels being
laminated, so I'm guessing he vacuum-formed them. I've
never bent
wood, whether steamed or laminated, in more than one plane.
I guess
there must have been a learning curve.

R

R:

I think its is doably "hand shaped" as I recall the article
quoting. Without skill and patience, it would take a
machine. My thought would be carving chisels and
sandpaper got a big workout along with guide profiles,
though the last could be avoided with craft since I
doubt there is any .000 mechanical exactitude in
the topology, nor need there be.

Once upon a time--but really--I had a chance to
buy a desk that looked like an elephant with a
rolltop or, better yet, an elephant and a roll top
combined. It was superb. It also was so overpowering
that you wouldn't see anything else in the rest of
the room when you entered...and if you did
have a later look arouind, it would have seemed
real odd if the decor wasn't the rest of the jungle.
Something similar might be a consideration with this
piece, although a spacious house that played
with furnished geometries....

Regards,

Edward Hennessey

To: Lee Michaels
Braille furniture?
By: Lee Michaels to rec.woodworking on Thu Apr 14 2011 04:30 pm



"RicodJour" wrote in message
...
Or just very tactile? Somehow I think the "Please Do Not Touch" sign
at the exhibition would be ignored.

http://freshome.com/2011/03/27/fasci...d-volumptuous-

short url for above is..
http://u.hulds.com/f28

wow nice... I would have brought it from him... hehe
love that odd funtures he makes.... lol

Did you see all the lumps on that??

Time to fire up the belt sander and smooth it out!

nay, i like it the way it is.... :-D



---
* Synchronet * The Whitehouse BBS --- whitehouse.hulds.com --- check it out free usenet!
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:16:37 -0700 (PDT), RicodJour
wrote:

Or just very tactile? Somehow I think the "Please Do Not Touch" sign
at the exhibition would be ignored.

http://freshome.com/2011/03/27/fasci...dward-johnson/

R

Also, you'd need a sign saying "Please do not put anything on top,
it'll slip and spill".

So much for form following function.

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:16:37 -0700 (PDT), RicodJour
wrote:

Or just very tactile? Somehow I think the "Please Do Not Touch" sign
at the exhibition would be ignored.

http://freshome.com/2011/03/27/fasci...dward-johnson/

R

Also, you'd need a sign saying "Please do not put anything on top,
it'll slip and spill".

So much for form following function.

Kind of reminds me of the RCA console stereo that I've been watching all
winter. It had been put out for trash pickup before the first snowfall,
got covered when the plow went through, and had been buried in
snowdrifts all winter. Maybe I should go pick it up, shellac it, and
sell it as "art".

On Apr 14, 7:05*pm, "Edward Hennessey"
wrote:
"RicodJour" wrote in message
On Apr 14, 4:30 pm, "Lee Michaels" leemichaels*nadaspam* at comcast dot net wrote:

I have no idea how he made that. He "hand made" it with
the "latest
material technology". What does that mean?

I assume it meant he hand assembled it after running
various panels through
a cnc router. I can't see doing al of that with a hammer
and chisel.

There was something, maybe not on that site, about the
panels being
laminated, so I'm guessing he vacuum-formed them. *I've
never bent
wood, whether steamed or laminated, in more than one plane.
I guess
there must have been a learning curve.

R:

I think its is doably "hand shaped" as I recall the article
quoting. Without skill and patience, it would take a
machine. My thought would be carving chisels and
sandpaper got a big workout along with guide profiles,
though the last could be avoided with craft since I
doubt there is any .000 mechanical exactitude in
the topology, nor need there be.

From the designer's web site:
http://www.ejbespokefurniture.co.uk/sideboard.php
"The once square frame work was hand shaped to follow each laminated
panels form"

Another site with some better pictures.
http://www.contemporist.com/2011/03/...dward-johnson/
Odd, that - better pictures than on the designer's own site. Weird.
And the exposed endgrain on the top front corners of the frame ****es
me off. It wouldn't have sacrificed anything to have the three frame
members meet and hide the endgrain, and considering how much time went
into that piece (and how much it must have cost) it seems like the
least that he could do.

R

On Apr 14, 4:30*pm, "Lee Michaels" leemichaels*nadaspam* at comcast
dot net wrote:
"RicodJour" wrote in message

...

Or just very tactile? Somehow I think the "Please Do Not Touch" sign
at the exhibition would be ignored.

http://freshome.com/2011/03/27/fasci...eboard-volumpt...

R

Did you see all the lumps on that??

Time to fire up the belt sander and smooth it out!

I have no idea how he made that. *He "hand made" it with the "latest
material technology". *What does that mean?

I assume it meant he hand assembled it after running various panels through
a cnc router. *I can't see doing al of that with *a hammer and chisel..

Chainsaw and 4.5" angle grinder, faster done than
described.

"RicodJour" wrote in message
...
On Apr 14, 7:05 pm, "Edward Hennessey"

wrote:
"RicodJour" wrote in message
On Apr 14, 4:30 pm, "Lee Michaels" leemichaels*nadaspam*
at comcast dot net wrote:

I have no idea how he made that. He "hand made" it with
the "latest
material technology". What does that mean?

I assume it meant he hand assembled it after running
various panels through
a cnc router. I can't see doing al of that with a hammer
and chisel.

There was something, maybe not on that site, about the
panels being
laminated, so I'm guessing he vacuum-formed them. I've
never bent
wood, whether steamed or laminated, in more than one
plane.
I guess
there must have been a learning curve.

R:

I think its is doably "hand shaped" as I recall the
article
quoting. Without skill and patience, it would take a
machine. My thought would be carving chisels and
sandpaper got a big workout along with guide profiles,
though the last could be avoided with craft since I
doubt there is any .000 mechanical exactitude in
the topology, nor need there be.

RDJ:

From the designer's web site:
http://www.ejbespokefurniture.co.uk/sideboard.php
"The once square frame work was hand shaped to follow each
laminated
panels form"
Another site with some better pictures.
http://www.contemporist.com/2011/03/...dward-johnson/
Odd, that - better pictures than on the designer's own site.
Weird.

The pictures worked better on the second site for me as
well.

And the exposed endgrain on the top front corners of the
frame ****es
me off. It wouldn't have sacrificed anything to have the
three frame
members meet and hide the endgrain, and considering how much
time went
into that piece (and how much it must have cost) it seems
like the
least that he could do.

If we're getting into theoretical druthers and bold daring,
it
would have been nice to see what the finished result would
be
if the piece wrapped the undulations around plane
transitions
into the end panels while doing away with acute angles and
straight lines in members dividing the drawers from the
organic
whole of the unit. Oh, and what's the rationale for those
sharp
corners in the end panels which are really underscored by
the
decision to use color contrast in the scheme? The first
thought
they evoke is puncturing, which may not be the best
complement
to bubbling motion which we just may take is the design
theme.


The invisible
back and bottoms wouldn't unanimously argue for the
mandatory
full treatment. Yet, if he would have worked the sinuous
theme artfully into the legs all the way down before they
capitulated to the rectilinear floor for stable contact,
that would have
signified a real stroke. End grain exposure also, as you
observed,
shorts sense.

What really makes me wonder is if he undertook modeling
efforts
to consider how the piece would have finished had it mounted
a convincing effort to fight the line everywhere with
curves. The work
required would have entailed a significant increase in
effort but the piece
is already "art", not inexpensive and, to my eye,
unconventional
without the acme of unconventionality being served. It's
very, very
fine: A work, undoubtedly. Sweeping greatness, however,
doesn't
much keep company with the "could have beens" that are
leftovers
from a long look here.

Regards,

Edward Hennessey







R

On Apr 15, 4:26*pm, Father Haskell wrote:
On Apr 14, 4:30*pm, "Lee Michaels" leemichaels*nadaspam* at comcast

I have no idea how he made that. *He "hand made" it with the "latest
material technology". *What does that mean?

I assume it meant he hand assembled it after running various panels through
a cnc router. *I can't see doing al of that with *a hammer and chisel.

Chainsaw and 4.5" angle grinder, faster done than
described.

Yep, that would be fast. What would be your guess as to the longevity
and stability of a wide-ish panel of non-uniform thickness? I'm
guessing it's cracking and/or cupping down the road. Considering that
the guy is selling "bespoke" furniture and he's a hoity-toity
designer, he's probably getting six grand for that piece. I'd imagine
if the thing started prematurely aging his customer would be mighty
unhappy and would cause trouble. His choice of laminated construction
is the best option.

R

All I saw were breast-es!

On 04/14/2011 04:16 PM, RicodJour wrote:
Or just very tactile? Somehow I think the "Please Do Not Touch" sign
at the exhibition would be ignored.

http://freshome.com/2011/03/27/fasci...dward-johnson/

R

"Edward Hennessey" wrote in message
...

"RicodJour" wrote in message
...
On Apr 14, 7:05 pm, "Edward Hennessey"
wrote:
"RicodJour" wrote in message
On Apr 14, 4:30 pm, "Lee Michaels" leemichaels*nadaspam* at
comcast dot net wrote:

I have no idea how he made that. He "hand made" it with
the "latest
material technology". What does that mean?

I assume it meant he hand assembled it after running
various panels through
a cnc router. I can't see doing al of that with a hammer
and chisel.

There was something, maybe not on that site, about the
panels being
laminated, so I'm guessing he vacuum-formed them. I've
never bent
wood, whether steamed or laminated, in more than one plane.
I guess
there must have been a learning curve.

R:

I think its is doably "hand shaped" as I recall the article
quoting. Without skill and patience, it would take a
machine. My thought would be carving chisels and
sandpaper got a big workout along with guide profiles,
though the last could be avoided with craft since I
doubt there is any .000 mechanical exactitude in
the topology, nor need there be.

RDJ:

From the designer's web site:
http://www.ejbespokefurniture.co.uk/sideboard.php
"The once square frame work was hand shaped to follow each laminated
panels form"
Another site with some better pictures.
http://www.contemporist.com/2011/03/...dward-johnson/
Odd, that - better pictures than on the designer's own site. Weird.

The pictures worked better on the second site for me as well.

And the exposed endgrain on the top front corners of the frame
****es
me off. It wouldn't have sacrificed anything to have the three
frame
members meet and hide the endgrain, and considering how much time
went
into that piece (and how much it must have cost) it seems like the
least that he could do.

If we're getting into theoretical druthers and bold daring, it
would have been nice to see what the finished result would be
if the piece wrapped the undulations around plane transitions
into the end panels while doing away with acute angles and
straight lines in members dividing the drawers from the organic
whole of the unit. Oh, and what's the rationale for those sharp
corners in the end panels which are really underscored by the
decision to use color contrast in the scheme? The first thought
they evoke is puncturing, which may not be the best complement
to bubbling motion which we just may take is the design theme.


The invisible
back and bottoms wouldn't unanimously argue for the mandatory
full treatment. Yet, if he would have worked the sinuous
theme artfully into the legs all the way down before they
capitulated to the rectilinear floor for stable contact, that would
have
signified a real stroke. End grain exposure also, as you observed,
shorts sense.

What really makes me wonder is if he undertook modeling efforts
to consider how the piece would have finished had it mounted
a convincing effort to fight the line everywhere with curves. The
work
required would have entailed a significant increase in effort but
the piece
is already "art", not inexpensive and, to my eye, unconventional
without the acme of unconventionality being served. It's very, very
fine: A work, undoubtedly. Sweeping greatness, however, doesn't
much keep company with the "could have beens" that are leftovers
from a long look here.

Regards,

Edward Hennessey

Apologies to everybody for the disrupted line-wrap
of the posting above.

The machine has been having some difficulties.
Before it's appointment with the metal hospital, a
program has been installed which will hopefully effect some
reduction of the problem.

As some relevant reward for your kind forbearance, here
is a paraphrase which always offers a humorous
turn on reviews of many art objects.

Painting
Noun
The art of protecting wood from the weather and
exposing it to the critic.

Credit goes to Ambrose Bierce in his excellent
"Devil's Dictionary".

And, RDJ, my bones feel the asking price on that piece
will break six large by quite a bit.

Regards,

Edward Hennessey

"Michael Kenefick" wrote in message
...
All I saw were breast-es!

On 04/14/2011 04:16 PM, RicodJour wrote:
Or just very tactile? Somehow I think the "Please Do Not Touch"
sign
at the exhibition would be ignored.

http://freshome.com/2011/03/27/fasci...dward-johnson/

R

MK:

I dunno at night, the spirits that go bump inside it might come out.

But your idea is better: women's unmentionable cabinet.

Then there's this:

http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&s...w=1032&bih=623

Regards,

Edward Hennessey

On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:25:00 -0700, "Edward Hennessey"
wrote:


"Michael Kenefick" wrote in message
...
All I saw were breast-es!

On 04/14/2011 04:16 PM, RicodJour wrote:
Or just very tactile? Somehow I think the "Please Do Not Touch"
sign
at the exhibition would be ignored.

http://freshome.com/2011/03/27/fasci...dward-johnson/

R

MK:

I dunno at night, the spirits that go bump inside it might come out.

But your idea is better: women's unmentionable cabinet.

Then there's this:

http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&s...w=1032&bih=623

That furniture and all this stuff looks like it's...


F E S T E R I N G !


--
Some people hear voices. Some see invisible people.
Others have no imagination whatsoever.

"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:25:00 -0700, "Edward Hennessey"
wrote:


"Michael Kenefick" wrote in message
...
All I saw were breast-es!

On 04/14/2011 04:16 PM, RicodJour wrote:
Or just very tactile? Somehow I think the "Please Do Not Touch"
sign
at the exhibition would be ignored.

http://freshome.com/2011/03/27/fasci...dward-johnson/

R

MK:

I dunno at night, the spirits that go bump inside it might come out.

But your idea is better: women's unmentionable cabinet.

Then there's this:

http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&s...w=1032&bih=623

That furniture and all this stuff looks like it's...


F E S T E R I N G !

LJ:

Now don't you get any evil thoughts about where to stick
that vintage "Bubble-Up" decal at the high-flying Bordeaux
and brie exhibition opening....though if you want
an invite, I'll wangle you one.

But, Jumping Jehosaphat, I'd love to see any picture that
arises in consequence of your appearance.

Regards,

Edward Hennessey


--
Some people hear voices. Some see invisible people.
Others have no imagination whatsoever.

On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:25:32 -0700, "Edward Hennessey"
wrote:


"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:25:00 -0700, "Edward Hennessey"
wrote:


"Michael Kenefick" wrote in message
...
All I saw were breast-es!

On 04/14/2011 04:16 PM, RicodJour wrote:
Or just very tactile? Somehow I think the "Please Do Not Touch"
sign
at the exhibition would be ignored.

http://freshome.com/2011/03/27/fasci...dward-johnson/

R

MK:

I dunno at night, the spirits that go bump inside it might come out.

But your idea is better: women's unmentionable cabinet.

Then there's this:

http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&s...w=1032&bih=623

That furniture and all this stuff looks like it's...


F E S T E R I N G !

LJ:

Now don't you get any evil thoughts about where to stick
that vintage "Bubble-Up" decal at the high-flying Bordeaux
and brie exhibition opening....though if you want
an invite, I'll wangle you one.

But, Jumping Jehosaphat, I'd love to see any picture that
arises in consequence of your appearance.

Y'mean checking the uric acid resistance of the finish?
My hip would surely never make the distance if it's a very large
showing, as I'd likely be lifting a leg on the brie-eaters, too.

pop (then he remembered how shy he is in public)

--
Some people hear voices. Some see invisible people.
Others have no imagination whatsoever.

"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:25:32 -0700, "Edward Hennessey"
wrote:


"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:25:00 -0700, "Edward Hennessey"
wrote:


"Michael Kenefick" wrote in message
...
All I saw were breast-es!

On 04/14/2011 04:16 PM, RicodJour wrote:
Or just very tactile? Somehow I think the "Please Do Not Touch"
sign
at the exhibition would be ignored.

http://freshome.com/2011/03/27/fasci...dward-johnson/

R

MK:

I dunno at night, the spirits that go bump inside it might come
out.

But your idea is better: women's unmentionable cabinet.

Then there's this:

http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&s...w=1032&bih=623

That furniture and all this stuff looks like it's...


F E S T E R I N G !

LJ:

Now don't you get any evil thoughts about where to stick
that vintage "Bubble-Up" decal at the high-flying Bordeaux
and brie exhibition opening....though if you want
an invite, I'll wangle you one.

But, Jumping Jehosaphat, I'd love to see any picture that
arises in consequence of your appearance.

Y'mean checking the uric acid resistance of the finish?
My hip would surely never make the distance if it's a very large
showing, as I'd likely be lifting a leg on the brie-eaters, too.

pop (then he remembered how shy he is in public)

LJ:

I was going to ask about your personal knowledge of
ammonia fuming to keep raveled to the thread but
think your expression of disdain for this project
mark you out as a responsible party.

But, speaking of "sliced volumptousness", a reference
grazed me the other day where fellows and femmes
of your political bent make merry: www.Atlasphere.com
Just one favor though, no pictures.

Regards,

Edward Hennessey

On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:03:54 -0700, "Edward Hennessey"
wrote:


"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:25:32 -0700, "Edward Hennessey"
wrote:


"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:25:00 -0700, "Edward Hennessey"
wrote:


"Michael Kenefick" wrote in message
...
All I saw were breast-es!

On 04/14/2011 04:16 PM, RicodJour wrote:
Or just very tactile? Somehow I think the "Please Do Not Touch"
sign
at the exhibition would be ignored.

http://freshome.com/2011/03/27/fasci...dward-johnson/

R

MK:

I dunno at night, the spirits that go bump inside it might come
out.

But your idea is better: women's unmentionable cabinet.

Then there's this:

http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&s...w=1032&bih=623

That furniture and all this stuff looks like it's...


F E S T E R I N G !

LJ:

Now don't you get any evil thoughts about where to stick
that vintage "Bubble-Up" decal at the high-flying Bordeaux
and brie exhibition opening....though if you want
an invite, I'll wangle you one.

But, Jumping Jehosaphat, I'd love to see any picture that
arises in consequence of your appearance.

Y'mean checking the uric acid resistance of the finish?
My hip would surely never make the distance if it's a very large
showing, as I'd likely be lifting a leg on the brie-eaters, too.

pop (then he remembered how shy he is in public)

LJ:

I was going to ask about your personal knowledge of
ammonia fuming to keep raveled to the thread but
think your expression of disdain for this project
mark you out as a responsible party.

But, speaking of "sliced volumptousness", a reference
grazed me the other day where fellows and femmes
of your political bent make merry: www.Atlasphere.com
Just one favor though, no pictures.

That looks like something put together by the scat crew, not my bent
at all.

--
If only he'd wash his neck, I'd wring it.
-- John Sparrow

"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:03:54 -0700, "Edward Hennessey"
wrote:


"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:25:32 -0700, "Edward Hennessey"
wrote:


"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
m...
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:25:00 -0700, "Edward Hennessey"
wrote:


"Michael Kenefick" wrote in message
...
All I saw were breast-es!

On 04/14/2011 04:16 PM, RicodJour wrote:
Or just very tactile? Somehow I think the "Please Do Not
Touch"
sign
at the exhibition would be ignored.

http://freshome.com/2011/03/27/fasci...dward-johnson/

R

MK:

I dunno at night, the spirits that go bump inside it might come
out.

But your idea is better: women's unmentionable cabinet.

Then there's this:

http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&s...w=1032&bih=623

That furniture and all this stuff looks like it's...


F E S T E R I N G !

LJ:

Now don't you get any evil thoughts about where to stick
that vintage "Bubble-Up" decal at the high-flying Bordeaux
and brie exhibition opening....though if you want
an invite, I'll wangle you one.

But, Jumping Jehosaphat, I'd love to see any picture that
arises in consequence of your appearance.

Y'mean checking the uric acid resistance of the finish?
My hip would surely never make the distance if it's a very large
showing, as I'd likely be lifting a leg on the brie-eaters, too.

pop (then he remembered how shy he is in public)

LJ:

I was going to ask about your personal knowledge of
ammonia fuming to keep raveled to the thread but
think your expression of disdain for this project
mark you out as a responsible party.

But, speaking of "sliced volumptousness", a reference
grazed me the other day where fellows and femmes
of your political bent make merry: www.Atlasphere.com
Just one favor though, no pictures.

That looks like something put together by the scat crew, not my bent
at all.


LJ:

Egad. That's what I get for letting the whisper go in one
ear and out a hunt-and-peck finger. Next time, I'll get
it in writing.

Checking further, the reference
I was meant to convey for your consideration is:

http://www.theatlasphere.com/

Regards,

Edward Hennessey

On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:00:44 -0700, "Edward Hennessey"
wrote:


"Larry Jaques" wrote in message

That looks like something put together by the scat crew, not my bent
at all.


LJ:

Egad. That's what I get for letting the whisper go in one
ear and out a hunt-and-peck finger. Next time, I'll get
it in writing.

Checking further, the reference
I was meant to convey for your consideration is:

http://www.theatlasphere.com/

In that case, someone would be likely to hide away until closing time
and add his scat to their offerings, then stealthily disappear.

--
Live in the sunshine, swim the sea, drink the wild air...
-- Ralph Waldo Emerson

"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:00:44 -0700, "Edward Hennessey"
wrote:


"Larry Jaques" wrote in message

That looks like something put together by the scat crew, not my
bent
at all.


LJ:

Egad. That's what I get for letting the whisper go in one
ear and out a hunt-and-peck finger. Next time, I'll get
it in writing.

Checking further, the reference
I was meant to convey for your consideration is:

http://www.theatlasphere.com/

In that case, someone would be likely to hide away until closing
time
and add his scat to their offerings, then stealthily disappear.

--

Hmmm...forgive me, LJ, if I have sinned. But I was told that
last-given site was a hotbed for the fans of Ayn Rand's
objectivism which you have positively mentioned. Yet, talking
politics often has the appeal of passing cyanide appetizers
at what might have otherwise been a charming social occasion.
where relationships missed establishment on more fond
or useful common interests like togas or wood.

But speaking of coprolites, here's fossil proof that
trash for one fish may be treasure for another:

http://www.archaeologydaily.com/news...ite-Marks.html



Regards,

Edward Hennessey

On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:35:50 -0700, "Edward Hennessey"
wrote:


"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:00:44 -0700, "Edward Hennessey"
wrote:


"Larry Jaques" wrote in message

That looks like something put together by the scat crew, not my
bent
at all.


LJ:

Egad. That's what I get for letting the whisper go in one
ear and out a hunt-and-peck finger. Next time, I'll get
it in writing.

Checking further, the reference
I was meant to convey for your consideration is:

http://www.theatlasphere.com/

In that case, someone would be likely to hide away until closing
time
and add his scat to their offerings, then stealthily disappear.

Oops, I had gone back to the original offering. This one mentions Ayn.
I'll have to check it out more furtherer.


--

Hmmm...forgive me, LJ, if I have sinned. But I was told that
last-given site was a hotbed for the fans of Ayn Rand's
objectivism which you have positively mentioned. Yet, talking
politics often has the appeal of passing cyanide appetizers
at what might have otherwise been a charming social occasion.
where relationships missed establishment on more fond
or useful common interests like togas or wood.

See above. Mea culpa. I thought it was the same URL as the fruity
pastel cartoon haircuts. 'Course, I was in shock after a severely
procrastinated IRS season. I plead insanity.


But speaking of coprolites, here's fossil proof that
trash for one fish may be treasure for another:

http://www.archaeologydaily.com/news...ite-Marks.html

Man, that shark was in trouble. He didn't have a tongue to help spit
it out. Ptui! I wonder what prompted him to taste that, anyway...

--
Live in the sunshine, swim the sea, drink the wild air...
-- Ralph Waldo Emerson