Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In gluing boards together to make a 30" by 7' top, a few months ago, someone
(sorry, I don't recall who) suggested including a threaded steel rod to guarantee strength. I just happend to pass by some today, so I came home with a 72" piece, 3/8" in diameter. It occured to me that I could face "alignment challenges" if try to use more than 1 steel rod, especially if I drill holes that are precisely 3/8". On the other hand, the steel rod (s) may help with alighnment when gluing. I expect to use 2 nuts on top of a washer at the end of each threaded rod and cover them for the sake of appearence. Bottom line: Do you advise, 1, 2 or 4 threaded (29") steel rods? Thanks, Bill P.S. In case anyone is interested and hasn't seen them, I posted skeletal design diagrams I made with SketchUp at alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking in the thread "Second SketchUp". |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill wrote:
In gluing boards together to make a 30" by 7' top, a few months ago, someone (sorry, I don't recall who) suggested including a threaded steel rod to guarantee strength. I just happend to pass by some today, so I came home with a 72" piece, 3/8" in diameter. It occured to me that I could face "alignment challenges" if try to use more than 1 steel rod, especially if I drill holes that are precisely 3/8". On the other hand, the steel rod (s) may help with alighnment when gluing. I expect to use 2 nuts on top of a washer at the end of each threaded rod and cover them for the sake of appearence. Bottom line: Do you advise, 1, 2 or 4 threaded (29") steel rods? I used 3 and was happy with the result. :-D -- Morris Dovey DeSoto Solar DeSoto, Iowa USA http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/ |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 8, 4:41*pm, "Bill" wrote:
P.S. In case anyone is interested and hasn't seen them, I posted skeletal design diagrams I made with SketchUp at alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking in the thread "Second SketchUp". From Google: Google Groups Home Cannot find alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking There is no group named alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking. • The link you followed may be broken or misspelled. • Search for alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking ?! Mutha%$^%$ Google. R |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RicodJour wrote:
On Oct 8, 4:41 pm, "Bill" wrote: P.S. In case anyone is interested and hasn't seen them, I posted skeletal design diagrams I made with SketchUp at alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking in the thread "Second SketchUp". From Google: Google Groups Home Cannot find alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking There is no group named alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking. • The link you followed may be broken or misspelled. • Search for alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking ?! Mutha%$^%$ Google. Google doesn't carry any binary groups. -- Froz... |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 8, 5:29*pm, FrozenNorth
wrote: RicodJour wrote: On Oct 8, 4:41 pm, "Bill" wrote: P.S. In case anyone is interested and hasn't seen them, I posted skeletal design diagrams I made with SketchUp at alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking in the thread "Second SketchUp". From Google: Google Groups Home * *Cannot find alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking There is no group named alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking. • * * * *The link you followed may be broken or misspelled. • * * * *Search for alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking ?! Mutha%$^%$ Google. Google doesn't carry any binary groups. Yeah, I know, or at least I had and then I had forgotten. I had the link to the hosting site bookmarked on my other laptop but I haven't switched that stuff over. Still, Mutha%$^%$ Google. ![]() R |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 8, 2:24 pm, RicodJour wrote:
On Oct 8, 4:41 pm, "Bill" wrote: P.S. In case anyone is interested and hasn't seen them, I posted skeletal design diagrams I made with SketchUp at alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking in the thread "Second SketchUp". From Google: Google Groups Home Cannot find alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking There is no group named alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking. • The link you followed may be broken or misspelled. • Search for alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking ?! Mutha%$^%$ Google. R Here's another link to something like ABPW- http://www.delorie.com/wood/abpw/ Thanks, DJ! |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 8, 5:54*pm, tom wrote:
On Oct 8, 2:24 pm, RicodJour wrote: On Oct 8, 4:41 pm, "Bill" wrote: P.S. In case anyone is interested and hasn't seen them, I posted skeletal design diagrams I made with SketchUp at alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking in the thread "Second SketchUp". From Google: Google Groups Home * * * * Cannot find alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking There is no group named alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking. • * * The link you followed may be broken or misspelled. • * * Search for alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking ?! Mutha%$^%$ Google. Here's another link to something like ABPW- *http://www.delorie.com/wood/abpw/ Thanks, DJ! Thanks, Tom. R |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just use over sized holes on all the inner pieces and 13/32 for the
hole in each outer piece. It is the clamping strength that matters not how tightly it is held internal. On Oct 8, 1:41*pm, "Bill" wrote: In gluing boards together to make a 30" by 7' top, a few months ago, someone (sorry, I don't recall who) suggested including a threaded steel rod to guarantee strength. *I just happend to pass by some today, so I came home with a 72" piece, 3/8" in diameter. *It occured to me that I could face "alignment challenges" if try to use more than 1 steel rod, especially if I drill holes that are precisely 3/8". On the other hand, the steel rod (s) may help with alighnment when gluing. I expect to use 2 nuts on top of a washer at the end of each threaded rod and cover them for the sake of appearence. Bottom line: Do you advise, 1, 2 or 4 threaded (29") steel rods? Thanks, Bill P.S. In case anyone is interested and hasn't seen them, I posted skeletal design diagrams I made with SketchUp at alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking in the thread "Second SketchUp". |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 8, 1:41*pm, "Bill" wrote:
In gluing boards together to make a 30" by 7' top, a few months ago, someone (sorry, I don't recall who) suggested including a threaded steel rod to guarantee strength. *I just happend to pass by some today, so I came home with a 72" piece, 3/8" in diameter. *It occured to me that I could face "alignment challenges" if try to use more than 1 steel rod, especially if I drill holes that are precisely 3/8". On the other hand, the steel rod (s) may help with alighnment when gluing. I expect to use 2 nuts on top of a washer at the end of each threaded rod and cover them for the sake of appearence. Bottom line: Do you advise, 1, 2 or 4 threaded (29") steel rods? I advise 0 threaded rods. They are not needed and don't add anything. If you need to align the pieces, use cauls. Luigi |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Luigi Zanasi" wrote: I advise 0 threaded rods. They are not needed and don't add anything. Agreed. If you need to align the pieces, use cauls. Follow my glue up schedule, cauls won't be req'd. Lew Luigi |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lew Hodgett" wrote in message ... "Luigi Zanasi" wrote: I advise 0 threaded rods. They are not needed and don't add anything. Agreed. Luigi Well, it looks like I'll return the threaded rod, and get my $5 back, unless someone can suggest what it might come in handy for... Maybe carp spearing? |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill wrote:
"Lew Hodgett" wrote in message ... "Luigi Zanasi" wrote: I advise 0 threaded rods. They are not needed and don't add anything. Agreed. Luigi Well, it looks like I'll return the threaded rod, and get my $5 back, unless someone can suggest what it might come in handy for... Maybe carp spearing? I needed some storage for all kinds of material. I used two 1/2" threaded rods, a 4" x 4" x 8', and two 1-1/2" 6' angle irons to hang a 4' x 8' OSB platform with 3/4" angle irons to support the edges from the gar^h^h^Hshop ceiling. all kinds of crap can be stored up there much to the OverLord/SWMBO's chagrin. - Doug |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 8, 5:34*pm, "Bill" wrote:
"Lew Hodgett" wrote in message "Luigi Zanasi" wrote: I advise 0 threaded rods. They are not needed and don't add anything. Agreed. Luigi Well, it looks like I'll return the threaded rod, and get my $5 back, unless someone can suggest what it might come in handy for... * Maybe carp spearing? Clamping, of course. I'd use the rod and holes for clamping 'til the glue hits full strength, then remove the rods for next project (there's a bundle of such rods in the corner of my shop). If you were using green wood, the rods could hold things together, and the nuts could be adjusted to take up slack, as well. Green wood doesn't take glue well. Most of my glue-ups of repetitive sorts (edges on plywood) are clamped with blocks-and-threaded-rod assemblies, which are easy to fabricate, by the dozen, as long as the threaded rod holds out. |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "whit3rd" wrote in message ... On Oct 8, 5:34 pm, "Bill" wrote: Well, it looks like I'll return the threaded rod, and get my $5 back, unless someone can suggest what it might come in handy for... Maybe carp spearing? Clamping, of course. I'd use the rod and holes for clamping 'til the glue hits full strength, then remove the rods for next project (there's a bundle of such rods in the corner of my shop). If you were using green wood, the rods could hold things together, and the nuts could be adjusted to take up slack, as well. Green wood doesn't take glue well. Most of my glue-ups of repetitive sorts (edges on plywood) are clamped with blocks-and-threaded-rod assemblies, which are easy to fabricate, by the dozen, as long as the threaded rod holds out. --- I appreciated reading your answer. Thanks! It reminds me that some use homemade block-clamps like this in violin making--they just don't need 3/8" diameter! --Bill |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Luigi Zanasi" wrote in message ... On Oct 8, 1:41 pm, "Bill" wrote: In gluing boards together to make a 30" by 7' top, a few months ago, someone (sorry, I don't recall who) suggested including a threaded steel rod to guarantee strength. I just happend to pass by some today, so I came home with a 72" piece, 3/8" in diameter. It occured to me that I could face "alignment challenges" if try to use more than 1 steel rod, especially if I drill holes that are precisely 3/8". On the other hand, the steel rod (s) may help with alighnment when gluing. I expect to use 2 nuts on top of a washer at the end of each threaded rod and cover them for the sake of appearence. Bottom line: Do you advise, 1, 2 or 4 threaded (29") steel rods? I advise 0 threaded rods. They are not needed and don't add anything. If you need to align the pieces, use cauls. Luigi Might they add support around the machinist's vise, an area which would be subject to some pounding? Bill |
#16
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/08/2009 02:41 PM, Bill wrote:
In gluing boards together to make a 30" by 7' top, a few months ago, someone (sorry, I don't recall who) suggested including a threaded steel rod to guarantee strength. Bottom line: Do you advise, 1, 2 or 4 threaded (29") steel rods? Personally...none. The wood will want to expand and contract with humidity changes. The steel rod won't. I built my bench with a laminated maple slab top, no end caps, no aprons. It sits on two trestle ends. Very similar to the knockdown Holtzhapffel by Chris Schwarz. Chris |
#17
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 8, 4:41*pm, "Bill" wrote:
Placement, regardless the number of rods, should (and I suspect you've thought of this) take into consideration the clamping dog holes, vise parts, planned or intended. .. |
#18
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill--
Though I used to use rods as you describe, I haven't for many years now because I came to believe they were unnecessary. Even as an alignment aid, there are easier ways. Here's a workbench I made a few years ago. No rods, and it's held up well. http://bullfire.net/Bench/WP_Bench.html |
#20
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Han wrote:
ed_h wrote in news:4f8d2a27-aa3b-4ecc-9c9e- : Bill-- Though I used to use rods as you describe, I haven't for many years now because I came to believe they were unnecessary. Even as an alignment aid, there are easier ways. Here's a workbench I made a few years ago. No rods, and it's held up well. http://bullfire.net/Bench/WP_Bench.html Let me be the first to say "Beautiful!" Well since "beautiful" is already taken, let ME be the first to say "Awesome!" :-) -- See Nad. See Nad go. Go Nad! To reply, eat the taco. http://www.flickr.com/photos/bbqboyee/ |
#21
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 10, 6:40*pm, Steve Turner
wrote: Han wrote: ed_h wrote in news:4f8d2a27-aa3b-4ecc-9c9e- : Bill-- Though I used to use rods as you describe, I haven't for many years now because I came to believe they were unnecessary. *Even as an alignment aid, there are easier ways. Here's a workbench I made a few years ago. *No rods, and it's held up well. http://bullfire.net/Bench/WP_Bench.html Let me be the first to say "Beautiful!" Well since "beautiful" is already taken, let ME be the first to say "Awesome!" *:-) Since I can't use beautiful and awesome, I'll just say WOW! Luigi |
#22
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 Oct 2009 01:08:10 GMT, the infamous Han
scrawled the following: ed_h wrote in news:4f8d2a27-aa3b-4ecc-9c9e- : Bill-- Though I used to use rods as you describe, I haven't for many years now because I came to believe they were unnecessary. Even as an alignment aid, there are easier ways. Here's a workbench I made a few years ago. No rods, and it's held up well. http://bullfire.net/Bench/WP_Bench.html Let me be the first to say "Beautiful!" I'll second that. I like the shop-built metal bits, too. Classy! --- Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday. --John Wayne (1907 - 1979) |
#23
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ed_h" wrote in message ... Bill-- Though I used to use rods as you describe, I haven't for many years now because I came to believe they were unnecessary. Even as an alignment aid, there are easier ways. Here's a workbench I made a few years ago. No rods, and it's held up well. http://bullfire.net/Bench/WP_Bench.html It looks beautiful and it is inspiring. Thank you for sharing. I have decided against using the threaded rods for the reasons you mentioned. Bill |
#24
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Following Lew's suggestion, I plan to rip some SYP 2 by 8 lumber in half,
glue the resultant pieces together with the factory cut side down, and sand the down side to make a workbech top. It will thus be approximately 7.25/2 3.5 inches thick. The Rockler 9" quick-release vise has drawn my attention. However it has a maximum top thickness of 2.75" inches. Since it's important to me to have the vise level with the top I have been contemplating a good way to cut the necessary "dado". What makes this tricky is that the best side is on the opposite site of the side that needs to be cut! One thought would be to put a nice board adjacent to the top and use it as support for the router. This might work fine for up to a few inches. Alternately, I could just cut it and shim it as necessary. My other ideas seem to break down because the surface I wish to cut on may not be flat or level. Always willing to listen to ideas... -------- I've also been thinking about binding the benchtop with some hardwood. I was thinking that this might look good and it may add structural integrity to the front vise (the rear jaw being seated in hardwood rather than SYP). Is this latter point a valid concern? Thank you for listening! Bill |
#25
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill" wrote in message ... Following Lew's suggestion, I plan to rip some SYP 2 by 8 lumber in half, glue the resultant pieces together with the factory cut side down, and sand the down side to make a workbech top. It will thus be approximately 7.25/2 3.5 inches thick. The Rockler 9" quick-release vise has drawn my attention. However it has a maximum top thickness of 2.75" inches. Since it's important to me to have the vise level with the top I have been contemplating a good way to cut the necessary "dado". What makes this tricky is that the best side is on the opposite site of the side that needs to be cut! One thought would be to put a nice board adjacent to the top and use it as support for the router. This might work fine for up to a few inches. Alternately, I could just cut it and shim it as necessary. My other ideas seem to break down because the surface I wish to cut on may not be flat or level. ... Thank you for listening! Bill I was thinking of the possibility of using a "bridge". How deep can plunge routers route (Dewalt 618)? Bill |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
using handsaw for workbench project: which TPI for crosscuts? | Woodworking | |||
Web Site: Ongoing project | Woodturning | |||
web site: ongoing project | Woodworking | |||
New general workbench project NEED HELP!! | Woodworking | |||
Latest project - beech workbench | Woodworking |