Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The entry level chain saw jig market seems to be dominated by the
Alaskan MkIII but Logosols Timberjig looks like a good quality product and in some ways superior to the MkIII. I would like people that have used either or both to critique these attachments in trying to saw lumber from felled trees. I do know they are much slower in comparison to larger mills and also that the more powerfull the saw the better. I am looking for positives and negatives between the two. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have no experience with either, but I did learn a great deal about milling
my own lumber on this group. http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/grou...1?viscount=100 I opted to build my own jigamathing and, though it's rather primitive, it works for small jobs. --dave "Orion T." wrote in message ups.com... The entry level chain saw jig market seems to be dominated by the Alaskan MkIII but Logosols Timberjig looks like a good quality product and in some ways superior to the MkIII. I would like people that have used either or both to critique these attachments in trying to saw lumber from felled trees. I do know they are much slower in comparison to larger mills and also that the more powerfull the saw the better. I am looking for positives and negatives between the two. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|