Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodworking Plans and Photos (alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking) - Show off or just share photos of your hard work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() -- GW Ross Macho does not prove Mucho. |
#2
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
G. Ross wrote:
that does not appear to be OSHA approved equipment or Sharpton for that matter |
#3
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G. Ross" wrote: GW Ross Macho does not prove Mucho. --------------------------------------- Reminds me of the brush saw my uncle designed and built to go on the front end of his 1938 J Deere tractor. Talk about nothing runs like a Deere. Lew |
#4
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"ChairMan" wrote in news:sobgw.347823$5U6.144627
@fx01.iad: G. Ross wrote: that does not appear to be OSHA approved equipment or Sharpton for that matter Maybe not, but it's probably quite safe. The blade pushes the chips away from the operator, and the operator has the machine between him and the blade. Wheel chocks may be a good idea, as the blade would tend to push the saw back towards the operator if something bound. The big dangerous spinning blade should keep others away. It's the kind of human engineering I'd like to term "It's dangerous, make it look dangerous." Puckdropper -- Make it to fit, don't make it fit. |
#5
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05 Dec 2014 06:47:27 GMT, Puckdropper wrote:
"ChairMan" wrote in news:sobgw.347823$5U6.144627 @fx01.iad: G. Ross wrote: that does not appear to be OSHA approved equipment or Sharpton for that matter Maybe not, but it's probably quite safe. The blade pushes the chips away from the operator, and the operator has the machine between him and the blade. Wheel chocks may be a good idea, as the blade would tend to push the saw back towards the operator if something bound. The big dangerous spinning blade should keep others away. It's the kind of human engineering I'd like to term "It's dangerous, make it look dangerous." Puckdropper So right, I've worked around industrial planers in lumber production all my working life. All planers are dangerous but the belt machines have a better safety record simply because they look every bit as dangerous as they are, and when shut off everything stops at the same time. Motorized machines look less intimidating and the heads all coast down at different times basilisk |
#6
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dont hit a rock.....
john "G. Ross" wrote in message ... -- GW Ross Macho does not prove Mucho. |
#7
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Puckdropper puckdropper(at)yahoo(dot)com wrote:
"ChairMan" wrote in news:sobgw.347823$5U6.144627 @fx01.iad: G. Ross wrote: that does not appear to be OSHA approved equipment or Sharpton for that matter Maybe not, but it's probably quite safe. The blade pushes the chips away from the operator, and the operator has the machine between him and the blade. Wheel chocks may be a good idea, as the blade would tend to push the saw back towards the operator if something bound. The big dangerous spinning blade should keep others away. It's the kind of human engineering I'd like to term "It's dangerous, make it look dangerous." Puckdropper Sorry......I forgot to put a sarcasm tag at the end of that. I guess I thought the Sharpton reference made it ; ) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|