Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 15, 8:55*pm, Ed Huntress wrote:
"Investigation of Knock limited Compression Ratio of Ethanol Gasoline Blends" James P. Szybist, Adam Youngquist, and Robert M. Wagner Oak Ridge National Laboratory Wayne Moore, Matt Foster, and Keith Confer Delphi Corporation http://info.ornl.gov/sites/publicati...s/Pub21839.pdf "It was found that at substantially similar engine conditions, increasing the ethanol content of the fuel results in higher engine efficiency and higher engine power. These results can be partially attributed to a charge cooling effect and a higher heating value of a stoichiometric mixture for ethanol blends (per unit mass of air). Additional thermodynamic effects on the ratio of specific heats (..) and a mole multiplier are also explored. "It was also found that high CR can increase the efficiency of ethanol fuel blends, and as a result, the fuel economy penalty associated with the lower energy content of E85 can be reduced by about twenty percent. Such operation necessitates that the engine be operated in a de-rated manner for gasoline, which is knock-prone at these high CR, in order to maintain compatibility. By using early and late intake valve closing strategies, good efficiency is maintained with gasoline, but peak power is about 33% lower than with E85." Ed Huntress You have left out this statement. "The higher efficiency of E85 is not sufficient to compensate for its reduced energy content relative to RG, thus there is still significantly higher fuel consumption for E85." Dan |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 05:46:19 -0800 (PST), "
wrote: On Feb 15, 8:55*pm, Ed Huntress wrote: "Investigation of Knock limited Compression Ratio of Ethanol Gasoline Blends" James P. Szybist, Adam Youngquist, and Robert M. Wagner Oak Ridge National Laboratory Wayne Moore, Matt Foster, and Keith Confer Delphi Corporation http://info.ornl.gov/sites/publicati...s/Pub21839.pdf "It was found that at substantially similar engine conditions, increasing the ethanol content of the fuel results in higher engine efficiency and higher engine power. These results can be partially attributed to a charge cooling effect and a higher heating value of a stoichiometric mixture for ethanol blends (per unit mass of air). Additional thermodynamic effects on the ratio of specific heats (..) and a mole multiplier are also explored. "It was also found that high CR can increase the efficiency of ethanol fuel blends, and as a result, the fuel economy penalty associated with the lower energy content of E85 can be reduced by about twenty percent. Such operation necessitates that the engine be operated in a de-rated manner for gasoline, which is knock-prone at these high CR, in order to maintain compatibility. By using early and late intake valve closing strategies, good efficiency is maintained with gasoline, but peak power is about 33% lower than with E85." Ed Huntress You have left out this statement. "The higher efficiency of E85 is not sufficient to compensate for its reduced energy content relative to RG, thus there is still significantly higher fuel consumption for E85." Dan Because that was never in dispute, Dan. Here's what was in dispute: [JB] "some/ race engines use ethanol. most don't. those that do use it do so because it's easier for firefighters to handle, not because it's a better fuel." ....to which I responded.... [EH] "Pure ethanol has an octane rating around 115, and it produces *some* of the evaporative cooling and densification that methanol does. It produces more horsepower than gasoline... "USAC never outlawed gasoline, but they changed the rules on fuel-tank capacity and number of required pit stops for 1965, eliminating the fuel-mileage advantage of gasoline and favoring the higher power obtained with methanol." I repeated, over and over, that gasoline has a per-gallon fuel-mileage advantage over both ethanol and methanol, but that both alcohols have an advantage in horsepower output and thermal efficiency. Given their stoichiometric ratios relative to that of gasoline and other factors, the result is that either alcohol can produce more horsepower than gasoline -- methanol more than ethanol. Thus, it's a better racing fuel, and racers use it where it's allowed. JB then proceeded to auger himself into the ground. I can't wait until he brings up the Japanese research. Maybe they re-invented thermodynamics. g -- Ed Huntress |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Where to get: pump for recirculating liquid - need high flow rateagainst high back pressure | Electronics Repair | |||
Why do (pool) water test strips have both a pH and Alkalinity Low to High scale? | Home Repair | |||
Experiments with Alternate Currents of High Potential and High Frequency, by Nikola Tesla | Electronic Schematics | |||
Denver though a mile high, is NOT on a mountain - DenverMountain.jpg | Electronic Schematics | |||
Engine compression rating = cilinder lb compression | Home Repair |