![]() |
No Subject
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y Subject: converting single to triple socket References: . com .com t In-Reply-To: t Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: (please include full headers) X-Trace: 9006026010c0e44218ae908973c0908466c0634969729ab8d7 0cce0043346b91 NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:54:41 +0100 Message-Id: Lines: 10 Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com uk.d-i-y:567079 Christian McArdle wrote: The B & Q version sounds like a more useful product. If somewhat against the spirit of the legislation. The thing is still capable of passing 3x13A and completely overloading the ring at a single point, even if it can deal with the current internally. And, of course, would contravene the regs if fitted on a spur. Owain |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter