View Single Post
  #15   Report Post  
Joe Blow
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:17:54 -0500, (J T)
wrote:

Tue, Jan 4, 2005, 8:11am
(Joe*Blow) spouts:
It's not a complicated question. "Good" is open for interpretation.
Thank you for your simple version.

That's a patronizing response (I try to be polite here, so I didn't
say smartass). MY post gave MY interpretation of a "good" planer stand.
And, in turn, I asked what you mean by a good stand - which you totally
ignored.

Do you actually expect to get any type of reasonable response, if
you can't even articulate what "your" interpretation of a "good" planer
stand would be?

I will repeat my question:
What do you mean by, "good stand"?

I'm beginning to figure you're just another troll.

JT,

I am not trying to be a troll. What I was hoping for when I first
asked the question was that I was polling the group for people's
experience on a "good" planer stand. I don't have the experience the
group has, so my idea of a "good" stand is not very relevant. If I
knew, I probably would not be asking.

In this thread, Igor and I have been conversing about his ideas and
suggestions. I haven't been rude or condescending. He made valid
suggestions. Your response to my original question was anything but
helpful.

I never understand questions like that. What do you mean by, "good
stand"?
I looked at some plans, then just made one. A couple of pieces
of plywood, slightly wider than my planer, and as tall as I wanted,
for the sides. Then glued in cross pieces, one to bolt the planer to,
and more lower, for a "box". I didn't put castors on it, but easy
enough to do that. It's a "good stand".


You may have not meant it as such, but I though your response was
condescending. I asked a simple straightforward question and you came
off like you wanted to pick a fight and still do.

My apologies if offended,
Joe